Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BAPTIST HEALTH LAGRANGE 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BAPTIST HEALTH LAGRANGE
CCN 180138 | KY | 42 beds | Current EBITDA $6.4M → Pro Forma $18.9M (+$12.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$236.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$6.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$12.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$18.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$9.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$12.5M
Modeled Uplift
$8.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.7M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $8.7M (vs $12.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$152K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$12.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.7M$4.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.6M$130K$4.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$727K$2.2M$2.9M$9.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$152K$152K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.6M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.2M$2.3M$3.5M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$961K$1.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$76K$152K$152K$152K$152K$152K$152K
Cumulative$0$3.4M$6.8M$10.1M$12.5M$12.5M$12.5M$12.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $12.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x81% / 19.5x86% / 22.0x90% / 24.5x92% / 25.8x93% / 27.0x
9.0x76% / 16.9x81% / 19.2x85% / 21.4x86% / 22.5x88% / 23.7x
10.0x72% / 14.9x76% / 16.9x80% / 19.0x82% / 20.0x84% / 21.0x
11.0x68% / 13.3x72% / 15.1x76% / 16.9x78% / 17.9x80% / 18.8x
12.0x64% / 11.9x68% / 13.6x72% / 15.3x74% / 16.1x76% / 16.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.6x
Headroom (turns)
56%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 56% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.9x, adding 5.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$6.4M$6.4M2.7%
Year 1$6.6M+$8.3M$14.9M6.3%
Year 2$6.8M+$12.5M$19.3M8.1%
Year 3$7.0M+$12.5M$19.5M8.2%
Year 4$7.2M+$12.5M$19.7M8.3%
Year 5$7.4M+$12.5M$19.9M8.4%
$64.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$218.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$154.7M
Value Created
$19.9M
Exit EBITDA
$10.2M
Organic Growth
$124.6M
RCM Value Creation
$19.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.4M$3.6M$4.7M$5.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.3M$3.5M$4.7M$5.6M
A/R Days Reduction$1.4M$2.2M$2.9M$3.5M
Clean Claim Rate$76K$114K$152K$182K
Total$6.2M$9.3M$12.5M$15.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 65 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.7%-11.0%-0.1%10.3%
P57
Net-to-Gross12.3%26.1%31.6%41.1%
P3
Occupancy30.2%25.6%36.8%64.2%
P32
Rev/Bed$5.6M$559K$852K$1.4M
P98
Exp/Bed$5.5M$548K$969K$1.3M
P98

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML