Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BAPTIST HEALTH LOUISVILLE 2026-04-26 03:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BAPTIST HEALTH LOUISVILLE
CCN 180130 | KY | 454 beds | Current EBITDA $-48.4M → Pro Forma $-12.8M (+$35.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$677.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-48.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$35.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-12.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$26.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$35.6M
Modeled Uplift
$24.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$11.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $24.4M (vs $35.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$13.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$13.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$8.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$433K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$35.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$13.5M$13.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$13.0M$372K$13.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.1M$6.2M$8.2M$26.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$433K$433K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.4M$6.8M$10.2M$13.5M$13.5M$13.5M$13.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.4M$6.7M$10.1M$13.4M$13.4M$13.4M$13.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.7M$5.5M$8.2M$8.2M$8.2M$8.2M$8.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$217K$433K$433K$433K$433K$433K$433K
Cumulative$0$9.7M$19.4M$28.9M$35.6M$35.6M$35.6M$35.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $35.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-48.4M$-48.4M-7.2%
Year 1$-49.9M+$23.7M$-26.1M-3.9%
Year 2$-51.4M+$35.6M$-15.8M-2.3%
Year 3$-52.9M+$35.6M$-17.3M-2.6%
Year 4$-54.5M+$35.6M$-18.9M-2.8%
Year 5$-56.2M+$35.6M$-20.5M-3.0%
$-484.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$-225.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$258.5M
Value Created
$-20.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-77.2M
Organic Growth
$356.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-20.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.8M$10.2M$13.5M$16.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.7M$10.1M$13.4M$16.1M
A/R Days Reduction$4.1M$6.2M$8.2M$9.9M
Clean Claim Rate$217K$325K$433K$520K
Total$17.8M$26.7M$35.6M$42.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 11 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-7.2%-14.9%-6.9%3.5%
P36
Net-to-Gross14.5%18.4%24.5%30.9%
P0
Occupancy68.3%63.5%68.0%72.5%
P55
Rev/Bed$1.5M$1.5M$1.7M$2.0M
P36
Exp/Bed$1.6M$1.6M$1.8M$2.0M
P27

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML