Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FRANKFORT REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FRANKFORT REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 180127 | KY | 118 beds | Current EBITDA $30.4M → Pro Forma $36.8M (+$6.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$122.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$30.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$36.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$6.4M
Modeled Uplift
$4.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.4M (vs $6.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$78K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.4M$2.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.4M$67K$2.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$375K$1.1M$1.5M$4.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$78K$78K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT43.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$611K$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$605K$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$496K$992K$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$39K$78K$78K$78K$78K$78K$78K
Cumulative$0$1.8M$3.5M$5.2M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.1x
9.0x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
10.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.5x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.5x
11.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.7x43% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x
12.0x28% / 3.4x33% / 4.2x38% / 4.9x40% / 5.3x41% / 5.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.5x
Headroom (turns)
-7%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -7% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.0x, adding 1.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$30.4M$30.4M24.9%
Year 1$31.3M+$4.3M$35.6M29.1%
Year 2$32.2M+$6.4M$38.7M31.6%
Year 3$33.2M+$6.4M$39.7M32.4%
Year 4$34.2M+$6.4M$40.6M33.2%
Year 5$35.2M+$6.4M$41.7M34.1%
$304.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$458.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$154.4M
Value Created
$41.7M
Exit EBITDA
$48.4M
Organic Growth
$64.3M
RCM Value Creation
$41.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M
A/R Days Reduction$744K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Clean Claim Rate$39K$59K$78K$94K
Total$3.2M$4.8M$6.4M$7.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 42 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin24.9%-9.3%1.0%10.3%
P83
Net-to-Gross15.1%17.8%28.8%43.3%
P10
Occupancy57.8%43.1%53.3%65.9%
P55
Rev/Bed$1.0M$417K$965K$1.5M
P52
Exp/Bed$779K$376K$895K$1.5M
P48

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML