Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MERCY HEALTH LOURDES HOSPITAL LLC 2026-04-26 03:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MERCY HEALTH LOURDES HOSPITAL LLC
CCN 180102 | KY | 178 beds | Current EBITDA $22.3M → Pro Forma $37.4M (+$15.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$288.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$22.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$15.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$37.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$15.2M
Modeled Uplift
$10.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $10.6M (vs $15.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$184K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$15.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.8M$5.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.5M$158K$5.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$884K$2.6M$3.5M$11.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$184K$184K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.4M$2.9M$4.3M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.4M$2.9M$4.3M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.3M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$92K$184K$184K$184K$184K$184K$184K
Cumulative$0$4.1M$8.3M$12.3M$15.2M$15.2M$15.2M$15.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $15.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.2x64% / 11.7x68% / 13.2x69% / 13.9x71% / 14.7x
9.0x54% / 8.7x59% / 10.0x63% / 11.4x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.7x
10.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x
11.0x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x
12.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.5x
Headroom (turns)
23%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 23% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.0x, adding 3.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$22.3M$22.3M7.7%
Year 1$22.9M+$10.1M$33.0M11.5%
Year 2$23.6M+$15.2M$38.8M13.5%
Year 3$24.3M+$15.2M$39.5M13.7%
Year 4$25.1M+$15.2M$40.2M14.0%
Year 5$25.8M+$15.2M$41.0M14.2%
$222.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$450.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$228.0M
Value Created
$41.0M
Exit EBITDA
$35.5M
Organic Growth
$151.6M
RCM Value Creation
$41.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.9M$4.3M$5.8M$6.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.9M$4.3M$5.7M$6.8M
A/R Days Reduction$1.8M$2.6M$3.5M$4.2M
Clean Claim Rate$92K$138K$184K$221K
Total$7.6M$11.4M$15.2M$18.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 36 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.7%-9.8%-1.0%6.6%
P75
Net-to-Gross22.9%18.6%29.5%34.6%
P36
Occupancy63.7%47.3%54.7%63.9%
P72
Rev/Bed$1.6M$718K$1.3M$1.6M
P75
Exp/Bed$1.5M$726K$1.4M$1.6M
P61

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML