Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CLARK REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:58 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CLARK REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 180092 | KY | 54 beds | Current EBITDA $25.8M → Pro Forma $34.1M (+$8.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$156.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$25.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$8.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$34.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$6.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$8.2M
Modeled Uplift
$6.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $6.1M (vs $8.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$100K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$8.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.1M$3.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.0M$86K$3.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$480K$1.4M$1.9M$6.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$100K$100K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT33.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$782K$1.6M$2.3M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$774K$1.5M$2.3M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$634K$1.3M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$50K$100K$100K$100K$100K$100K$100K
Cumulative$0$2.2M$4.5M$6.7M$8.2M$8.2M$8.2M$8.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $8.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.8x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
9.0x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x
10.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x
11.0x36% / 4.6x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x
12.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.1x
Headroom (turns)
1%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 1% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.4x, adding 2.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$25.8M$25.8M16.5%
Year 1$26.6M+$5.5M$32.1M20.5%
Year 2$27.4M+$8.2M$35.6M22.8%
Year 3$28.2M+$8.2M$36.5M23.3%
Year 4$29.1M+$8.2M$37.3M23.9%
Year 5$29.9M+$8.2M$38.2M24.4%
$258.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$419.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$161.6M
Value Created
$38.2M
Exit EBITDA
$41.1M
Organic Growth
$82.3M
RCM Value Creation
$38.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.6M$2.3M$3.1M$3.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.5M$2.3M$3.1M$3.7M
A/R Days Reduction$952K$1.4M$1.9M$2.3M
Clean Claim Rate$50K$75K$100K$120K
Total$4.1M$6.2M$8.2M$9.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 46 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin16.5%-10.7%0.0%9.7%
P87
Net-to-Gross20.3%17.8%27.0%33.5%
P37
Occupancy67.7%25.4%36.3%61.4%
P83
Rev/Bed$2.9M$374K$655K$1.4M
P96
Exp/Bed$2.4M$367K$692K$1.5M
P91

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML