Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — OWENSBORO HEALTH TWIN LAKES MEDICAL 2026-04-26 14:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — OWENSBORO HEALTH TWIN LAKES MEDICAL
CCN 180070 | KY | 49 beds | Current EBITDA $8.2M → Pro Forma $11.1M (+$2.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$55.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$11.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$2.9M
Modeled Uplift
$1.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.8M (vs $2.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$672K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$35K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.1M$1.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.1M$30K$1.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$170K$503K$672K$2.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$35K$35K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$276K$552K$829K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$273K$547K$820K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$224K$448K$672K$672K$672K$672K$672K
Clean Claim Rate$0$18K$35K$35K$35K$35K$35K$35K
Cumulative$0$791K$1.6M$2.4M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.1x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.5x
9.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x
10.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
11.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x
12.0x33% / 4.1x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.3x
Headroom (turns)
4%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 4% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.2x, adding 2.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.2M$8.2M14.8%
Year 1$8.4M+$1.9M$10.4M18.7%
Year 2$8.7M+$2.9M$11.6M20.9%
Year 3$8.9M+$2.9M$11.8M21.4%
Year 4$9.2M+$2.9M$12.1M21.9%
Year 5$9.5M+$2.9M$12.4M22.4%
$81.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$136.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$54.5M
Value Created
$12.4M
Exit EBITDA
$13.0M
Organic Growth
$29.1M
RCM Value Creation
$12.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$552K$829K$1.1M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$547K$820K$1.1M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$336K$504K$672K$807K
Clean Claim Rate$18K$27K$35K$42K
Total$1.5M$2.2M$2.9M$3.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 69 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin14.8%-11.0%-1.0%10.3%
P84
Net-to-Gross31.9%20.7%30.7%41.1%
P52
Occupancy25.8%25.6%35.9%53.5%
P28
Rev/Bed$1.1M$472K$844K$1.3M
P65
Exp/Bed$961K$472K$961K$1.3M
P49

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML