Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:58 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
CCN 180067 | KY | 1000 beds | Current EBITDA $-260.6M → Pro Forma $-140.0M (+$120.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$2.29B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-260.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$120.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-140.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$87.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$120.6M
Modeled Uplift
$81.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$38.9M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $81.7M (vs $120.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$45.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$45.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$27.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$1.5M
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$120.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$45.8M$45.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$44.1M$1.3M$45.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$7.0M$20.9M$27.9M$87.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$1.5M$1.5M$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$11.5M$22.9M$34.4M$45.8M$45.8M$45.8M$45.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$11.3M$22.7M$34.0M$45.4M$45.4M$45.4M$45.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$9.3M$18.6M$27.9M$27.9M$27.9M$27.9M$27.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$733K$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Cumulative$0$32.8M$65.7M$97.8M$120.6M$120.6M$120.6M$120.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $120.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-260.6M$-260.6M-11.4%
Year 1$-268.4M+$80.4M$-188.0M-8.2%
Year 2$-276.4M+$120.6M$-155.9M-6.8%
Year 3$-284.7M+$120.6M$-164.1M-7.2%
Year 4$-293.3M+$120.6M$-172.7M-7.5%
Year 5$-302.1M+$120.6M$-181.5M-7.9%
$-2.61B
Entry EV (10x)
$-2.00B
Exit EV (11x)
$609.2M
Value Created
$-181.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-415.0M
Organic Growth
$1.21B
RCM Value Creation
$-181.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$22.9M$34.4M$45.8M$55.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$22.7M$34.0M$45.4M$54.5M
A/R Days Reduction$13.9M$20.9M$27.9M$33.5M
Clean Claim Rate$733K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Total$60.3M$90.4M$120.6M$144.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 269 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-11.4%-15.3%-4.3%4.1%
P31
Net-to-Gross26.7%20.7%26.7%31.4%
P50
Occupancy87.2%68.7%77.6%84.6%
P80
Rev/Bed$2.3M$1.5M$1.9M$2.6M
P65
Exp/Bed$2.6M$1.4M$2.0M$2.8M
P68

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML