Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DEACONESS HENDERSON HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DEACONESS HENDERSON HOSPITAL
CCN 180056 | KY | 118 beds | Current EBITDA $7.9M → Pro Forma $14.6M (+$6.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$127.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$7.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$14.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$6.7M
Modeled Uplift
$4.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.2M (vs $6.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$81K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.5M$2.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.5M$70K$2.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$391K$1.2M$1.5M$4.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$81K$81K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT43.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$636K$1.3M$1.9M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$630K$1.3M$1.9M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$516K$1.0M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$41K$81K$81K$81K$81K$81K$81K
Cumulative$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.4M$6.7M$6.7M$6.7M$6.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x63% / 11.4x67% / 13.1x71% / 14.7x73% / 15.5x75% / 16.3x
9.0x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.3x66% / 12.7x68% / 13.4x70% / 14.2x
10.0x53% / 8.5x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.4x
11.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x
12.0x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.9x
Headroom (turns)
30%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 30% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.6x, adding 3.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$7.9M$7.9M6.2%
Year 1$8.1M+$4.5M$12.6M9.9%
Year 2$8.4M+$6.7M$15.1M11.8%
Year 3$8.6M+$6.7M$15.3M12.0%
Year 4$8.9M+$6.7M$15.6M12.2%
Year 5$9.1M+$6.7M$15.8M12.4%
$78.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$174.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$95.3M
Value Created
$15.8M
Exit EBITDA
$12.5M
Organic Growth
$67.0M
RCM Value Creation
$15.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.3M$1.9M$2.5M$3.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.3M$1.9M$2.5M$3.0M
A/R Days Reduction$775K$1.2M$1.5M$1.9M
Clean Claim Rate$41K$61K$81K$98K
Total$3.3M$5.0M$6.7M$8.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 42 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.2%-9.3%1.0%10.3%
P62
Net-to-Gross33.0%17.8%28.8%43.3%
P57
Occupancy29.7%43.1%53.3%65.9%
P17
Rev/Bed$1.1M$417K$965K$1.5M
P55
Exp/Bed$1.0M$376K$895K$1.5M
P50

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML