Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HARLAN ARH 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HARLAN ARH
CCN 180050 | KY | 56 beds | Current EBITDA $-16.8M → Pro Forma $-13.2M (+$3.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$69.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-16.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-13.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$3.7M
Modeled Uplift
$2.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.4M (vs $3.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$851K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$45K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.4M$1.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.3M$38K$1.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$215K$636K$851K$2.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$45K$45K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$350K$699K$1.0M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$346K$692K$1.0M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$284K$567K$851K$851K$851K$851K$851K
Clean Claim Rate$0$22K$45K$45K$45K$45K$45K$45K
Cumulative$0$1.0M$2.0M$3.0M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-16.8M$-16.8M-24.1%
Year 1$-17.3M+$2.5M$-14.9M-21.3%
Year 2$-17.9M+$3.7M$-14.2M-20.3%
Year 3$-18.4M+$3.7M$-14.7M-21.0%
Year 4$-18.9M+$3.7M$-15.3M-21.8%
Year 5$-19.5M+$3.7M$-15.8M-22.6%
$-168.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$-174.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$-5.9M
Value Created
$-15.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-26.8M
Organic Growth
$36.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-15.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$699K$1.0M$1.4M$1.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$692K$1.0M$1.4M$1.7M
A/R Days Reduction$425K$638K$851K$1.0M
Clean Claim Rate$22K$34K$45K$54K
Total$1.8M$2.8M$3.7M$4.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 50 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-24.1%-10.8%0.0%10.3%
P12
Net-to-Gross20.0%18.5%27.4%34.4%
P32
Occupancy35.7%25.7%42.3%61.4%
P42
Rev/Bed$1.2M$353K$655K$1.5M
P68
Exp/Bed$1.5M$356K$692K$1.6M
P72

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML