Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UOFL HEALTH-LOUISVILLE 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UOFL HEALTH-LOUISVILLE
CCN 180040 | KY | 789 beds | Current EBITDA $88.6M → Pro Forma $148.2M (+$59.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.13B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$88.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$59.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$148.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$43.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$59.5M
Modeled Uplift
$38.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$21.2M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $38.3M (vs $59.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$22.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$22.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$13.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$724K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$59.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$22.6M$22.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$21.8M$623K$22.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$3.5M$10.3M$13.8M$43.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$724K$724K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$5.7M$11.3M$17.0M$22.6M$22.6M$22.6M$22.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$5.6M$11.2M$16.8M$22.4M$22.4M$22.4M$22.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$4.6M$9.2M$13.8M$13.8M$13.8M$13.8M$13.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$362K$724K$724K$724K$724K$724K$724K
Cumulative$0$16.2M$32.4M$48.3M$59.5M$59.5M$59.5M$59.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $59.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.6x67% / 13.1x69% / 13.9x71% / 14.6x
9.0x54% / 8.7x58% / 10.0x62% / 11.3x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.6x
10.0x49% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x
11.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x
12.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.4x
Headroom (turns)
22%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 22% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.1x, adding 3.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$88.6M$88.6M7.8%
Year 1$91.3M+$39.7M$131.0M11.6%
Year 2$94.0M+$59.5M$153.6M13.6%
Year 3$96.8M+$59.5M$156.4M13.8%
Year 4$99.7M+$59.5M$159.3M14.1%
Year 5$102.7M+$59.5M$162.3M14.3%
$886.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.78B
Exit EV (11x)
$898.9M
Value Created
$162.3M
Exit EBITDA
$141.1M
Organic Growth
$595.5M
RCM Value Creation
$162.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$11.3M$17.0M$22.6M$27.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$11.2M$16.8M$22.4M$26.9M
A/R Days Reduction$6.9M$10.3M$13.8M$16.5M
Clean Claim Rate$362K$543K$724K$869K
Total$29.8M$44.7M$59.5M$71.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 418 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.8%-14.6%-4.6%4.1%
P83
Net-to-Gross31.1%20.4%26.5%31.8%
P71
Occupancy68.0%67.1%75.5%83.3%
P28
Rev/Bed$1.4M$1.4M$1.8M$2.4M
P27
Exp/Bed$1.3M$1.3M$1.9M$2.7M
P24

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML