Bridge Realization Estimate
ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)
Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.4M (vs $8.1M modeled).
EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers
Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).
Lever Detail
Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.
| Lever | Current | Target | Revenue | Cost | EBITDA | WC | Ramp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | 4.5% DEFAULT | 2.5% BENCHMARK | $0 | $3.1M | $3.1M | $0 | 12mo |
| Denial Rate Reduction | 12.0% DEFAULT | 6.5% BENCHMARK | $3.0M | $85K | $3.1M | $0 | 12mo |
| A/R Days Reduction | 52.00 DEFAULT | 38.00 BENCHMARK | $473K | $1.4M | $1.9M | $5.9M | 9mo |
| Clean Claim Rate | 88.0% DEFAULT | 96.0% BENCHMARK | $0 | $99K | $99K | $0 | 6mo |
| Net Collection Rate | 93.5% DEFAULT | 41.5% BENCHMARK | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 18mo |
| CDI / Case Mix Index | 135.0% DEFAULT | 142.0% BENCHMARK | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 18mo |
Implementation Timing Curve
Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.
| Lever | M0 | M3 | M6 | M9 | M12 | M18 | M24 | M36 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | $0 | $771K | $1.5M | $2.3M | $3.1M | $3.1M | $3.1M | $3.1M |
| Denial Rate Reduction | $0 | $763K | $1.5M | $2.3M | $3.1M | $3.1M | $3.1M | $3.1M |
| A/R Days Reduction | $0 | $625K | $1.3M | $1.9M | $1.9M | $1.9M | $1.9M | $1.9M |
| Clean Claim Rate | $0 | $49K | $99K | $99K | $99K | $99K | $99K | $99K |
| Cumulative | $0 | $2.2M | $4.4M | $6.6M | $8.1M | $8.1M | $8.1M | $8.1M |
Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)
5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $8.1M is added at exit.
| Entry \ Exit | 9.0x | 10.0x | 11.0x | 11.5x | 12.0x |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.0x | 219% / 328.6x | 226% / 365.4x | 232% / 402.3x | 235% / 420.8x | 238% / 439.2x |
| 9.0x | 211% / 291.7x | 218% / 324.5x | 224% / 357.2x | 227% / 373.6x | 230% / 390.0x |
| 10.0x | 205% / 262.2x | 211% / 291.7x | 217% / 321.2x | 220% / 335.9x | 223% / 350.7x |
| 11.0x | 199% / 238.1x | 205% / 264.9x | 211% / 291.7x | 214% / 305.1x | 217% / 318.5x |
| 12.0x | 194% / 218.0x | 200% / 242.6x | 206% / 267.1x | 208% / 279.4x | 211% / 291.7x |
Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)
Pro forma EBITDA can decline 97% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.2x, adding 8.3 turns of cushion.
5-Year Value Creation Waterfall
EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).
| Base EBITDA | RCM Uplift | Total | Margin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | $183K | — | $183K | 0.1% |
| Year 1 | $189K | +$5.4M | $5.6M | 3.6% |
| Year 2 | $195K | +$8.1M | $8.3M | 5.4% |
| Year 3 | $200K | +$8.1M | $8.3M | 5.4% |
| Year 4 | $206K | +$8.1M | $8.3M | 5.4% |
| Year 5 | $213K | +$8.1M | $8.3M | 5.4% |
Achievement Sensitivity
What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.
| Lever | 50% | 75% | 100% | 120% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | $1.5M | $2.3M | $3.1M | $3.7M |
| Denial Rate Reductio | $1.5M | $2.3M | $3.1M | $3.7M |
| A/R Days Reduction | $938K | $1.4M | $1.9M | $2.3M |
| Clean Claim Rate | $49K | $74K | $99K | $118K |
| Total | $4.1M | $6.1M | $8.1M | $9.7M |
Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits
Key metrics vs 45 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.
| Metric | Hospital | P25 | P50 | P75 | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Op Margin | 0.1% | -9.6% | 0.7% | 10.4% | P44 |
| Net-to-Gross | 29.8% | 17.5% | 24.9% | 41.6% | P53 |
| Occupancy | 43.9% | 42.9% | 53.6% | 66.4% | P27 |
| Rev/Bed | $1.6M | $426K | $1.0M | $1.5M | P78 |
| Exp/Bed | $1.6M | $417K | $1.0M | $1.5M | P80 |
Bridge Methodology
Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.