Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MIDDLESBORO ARH 2026-04-26 09:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MIDDLESBORO ARH
CCN 180020 | KY | 46 beds | Current EBITDA $-11.6M → Pro Forma $-9.6M (+$1.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$36.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-11.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-9.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$1.9M
Modeled Uplift
$1.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$712K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.2M (vs $1.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$737K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$729K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$448K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$24K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$737K$737K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$709K$20K$729K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$113K$335K$448K$1.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$24K$24K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$184K$368K$553K$737K$737K$737K$737K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$182K$365K$547K$729K$729K$729K$729K
A/R Days Reduction$0$149K$299K$448K$448K$448K$448K$448K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K
Cumulative$0$528K$1.1M$1.6M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-11.6M$-11.6M-31.4%
Year 1$-11.9M+$1.3M$-10.6M-28.9%
Year 2$-12.3M+$1.9M$-10.3M-28.1%
Year 3$-12.6M+$1.9M$-10.7M-29.1%
Year 4$-13.0M+$1.9M$-11.1M-30.1%
Year 5$-13.4M+$1.9M$-11.5M-31.2%
$-115.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$-126.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$-10.5M
Value Created
$-11.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-18.4M
Organic Growth
$19.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-11.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$368K$553K$737K$884K
Denial Rate Reductio$365K$547K$729K$875K
A/R Days Reduction$224K$336K$448K$538K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$18K$24K$28K
Total$969K$1.5M$1.9M$2.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 69 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-31.4%-11.0%-0.6%10.3%
P6
Net-to-Gross17.1%22.2%31.6%41.1%
P12
Occupancy32.0%25.6%35.9%61.9%
P36
Rev/Bed$801K$527K$844K$1.4M
P45
Exp/Bed$1.1M$548K$961K$1.3M
P54

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML