Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — THE MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — THE MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 180013 | KY | 310 beds | Current EBITDA $18.8M → Pro Forma $42.5M (+$23.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$451.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$18.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$23.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$42.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$17.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$23.7M
Modeled Uplift
$16.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$7.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $16.6M (vs $23.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$9.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$289K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$23.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$9.0M$9.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.7M$248K$8.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.4M$4.1M$5.5M$17.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$289K$289K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT36.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.3M$4.5M$6.8M$9.0M$9.0M$9.0M$9.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.2M$4.5M$6.7M$8.9M$8.9M$8.9M$8.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.8M$3.7M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$144K$289K$289K$289K$289K$289K$289K
Cumulative$0$6.5M$12.9M$19.2M$23.7M$23.7M$23.7M$23.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $23.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x71% / 14.4x75% / 16.4x79% / 18.4x81% / 19.4x83% / 20.4x
9.0x66% / 12.5x70% / 14.2x74% / 16.0x76% / 16.9x78% / 17.7x
10.0x61% / 10.9x66% / 12.5x70% / 14.1x72% / 14.8x73% / 15.6x
11.0x57% / 9.6x62% / 11.1x66% / 12.5x68% / 13.2x69% / 13.9x
12.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.8x
Headroom (turns)
42%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 42% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.7x, adding 4.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$18.8M$18.8M4.2%
Year 1$19.4M+$15.8M$35.2M7.8%
Year 2$20.0M+$23.7M$43.7M9.7%
Year 3$20.6M+$23.7M$44.3M9.8%
Year 4$21.2M+$23.7M$44.9M10.0%
Year 5$21.8M+$23.7M$45.5M10.1%
$188.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$501.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$312.8M
Value Created
$45.5M
Exit EBITDA
$30.0M
Organic Growth
$237.2M
RCM Value Creation
$45.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.5M$6.8M$9.0M$10.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.5M$6.7M$8.9M$10.7M
A/R Days Reduction$2.7M$4.1M$5.5M$6.6M
Clean Claim Rate$144K$216K$289K$346K
Total$11.9M$17.8M$23.7M$28.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 19 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.2%-15.2%-1.5%3.5%
P74
Net-to-Gross30.7%16.7%24.5%36.0%
P58
Occupancy73.0%59.3%65.0%72.5%
P74
Rev/Bed$1.5M$1.3M$1.5M$1.8M
P37
Exp/Bed$1.4M$1.4M$1.5M$1.9M
P21

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML