Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BAPTIST HEALTH HARDIN 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BAPTIST HEALTH HARDIN
CCN 180012 | KY | 259 beds | Current EBITDA $-6.7M → Pro Forma $17.4M (+$24.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$459.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-6.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$24.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$17.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$17.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$24.2M
Modeled Uplift
$16.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$7.7M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $16.5M (vs $24.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$9.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$9.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$294K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$24.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$9.2M$9.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.8M$253K$9.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.4M$4.2M$5.6M$17.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$294K$294K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.3M$4.6M$6.9M$9.2M$9.2M$9.2M$9.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.3M$4.5M$6.8M$9.1M$9.1M$9.1M$9.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.9M$3.7M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$147K$294K$294K$294K$294K$294K$294K
Cumulative$0$6.6M$13.2M$19.6M$24.2M$24.2M$24.2M$24.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $24.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-3.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
9.8x
Headroom (turns)
150%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 150% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -3.3x, adding 102.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-6.7M$-6.7M-1.5%
Year 1$-6.9M+$16.1M$9.2M2.0%
Year 2$-7.2M+$24.2M$17.0M3.7%
Year 3$-7.4M+$24.2M$16.8M3.7%
Year 4$-7.6M+$24.2M$16.6M3.6%
Year 5$-7.8M+$24.2M$16.4M3.6%
$-67.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$179.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$247.3M
Value Created
$16.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-10.7M
Organic Growth
$241.7M
RCM Value Creation
$16.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.6M$6.9M$9.2M$11.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.5M$6.8M$9.1M$10.9M
A/R Days Reduction$2.8M$4.2M$5.6M$6.7M
Clean Claim Rate$147K$221K$294K$353K
Total$12.1M$18.1M$24.2M$29.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 23 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.5%-15.2%-1.5%3.5%
P48
Net-to-Gross16.0%16.7%24.5%34.8%
P13
Occupancy57.4%56.4%64.6%72.5%
P26
Rev/Bed$1.8M$1.3M$1.5M$1.7M
P78
Exp/Bed$1.8M$1.4M$1.5M$1.8M
P74

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML