Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — OSAWATOMIE STATE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:15 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — OSAWATOMIE STATE HOSPITAL
CCN 174022 | KS | 60 beds | Current EBITDA $159K → Pro Forma $280K (+$120K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$2.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$159K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$120K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$280K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+604bps
Margin Improvement
$76K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$120K
Modeled Uplift
$79K
Risk-Adjusted
-$41K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.1M (vs $0.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$47K
+234bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$40K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$24K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+48bp
Total EBITDA Impact$120K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$38K$8K$47K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$40K$40K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$6K$18K$24K$76K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$12K$23K$35K$47K$47K$47K$47K
Cost to Collect$0$10K$20K$30K$40K$40K$40K$40K
A/R Days Reduction$0$8K$16K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$34K$69K$99K$120K$120K$120K$120K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $120K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.3x69% / 13.9x71% / 14.6x73% / 15.4x
9.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.6x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.7x68% / 13.3x
10.0x51% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.1x63% / 11.7x
11.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.3x
12.0x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.7x
Headroom (turns)
26%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 26% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.8x, adding 3.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$159K$159K8.0%
Year 1$164K+$80K$244K12.3%
Year 2$169K+$120K$289K14.5%
Year 3$174K+$120K$294K14.8%
Year 4$179K+$120K$300K15.0%
Year 5$185K+$120K$305K15.3%
$1.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$3.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$1.8M
Value Created
$305K
Exit EBITDA
$254K
Organic Growth
$1.2M
RCM Value Creation
$305K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$23K$35K$47K$56K
Cost to Collect$20K$30K$40K$48K
A/R Days Reduction$12K$18K$24K$29K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$60K$90K$120K$144K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 38 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-20.9%-7.9%0.7%
P0
Net-to-Gross3.1%27.4%32.6%42.0%
P0
Occupancy49.6%26.6%36.6%53.3%
P68
Rev/Bed$33K$391K$813K$1.4M
P0
Exp/Bed$1.0M$505K$1.0M$1.4M
P45

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML