Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — COTTONWOOD SPRINGS 2026-04-26 12:35 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — COTTONWOOD SPRINGS
CCN 174020 | KS | 72 beds | Current EBITDA $507K → Pro Forma $1.9M (+$1.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$27.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$507K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$1.4M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$377K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$545K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$539K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$331K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$17K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$545K$545K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$524K$15K$539K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$84K$248K$331K$1.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$17K$17K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT39.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$136K$272K$409K$545K$545K$545K$545K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$135K$270K$404K$539K$539K$539K$539K
A/R Days Reduction$0$110K$221K$331K$331K$331K$331K$331K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K
Cumulative$0$390K$780K$1.2M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x92% / 25.9x96% / 29.1x100% / 32.4x102% / 34.0x104% / 35.6x
9.0x87% / 22.6x91% / 25.5x95% / 28.4x97% / 29.8x99% / 31.3x
10.0x82% / 20.1x87% / 22.6x91% / 25.2x93% / 26.5x94% / 27.8x
11.0x78% / 17.9x83% / 20.3x87% / 22.6x89% / 23.8x90% / 25.0x
12.0x74% / 16.2x79% / 18.3x83% / 20.5x85% / 21.6x87% / 22.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.3x
Headroom (turns)
66%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 66% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.2x, adding 6.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$507K$507K1.9%
Year 1$522K+$955K$1.5M5.4%
Year 2$538K+$1.4M$2.0M7.2%
Year 3$554K+$1.4M$2.0M7.3%
Year 4$571K+$1.4M$2.0M7.4%
Year 5$588K+$1.4M$2.0M7.4%
$5.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$22.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$17.2M
Value Created
$2.0M
Exit EBITDA
$808K
Organic Growth
$14.3M
RCM Value Creation
$2.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$272K$409K$545K$654K
Denial Rate Reductio$270K$404K$539K$647K
A/R Days Reduction$166K$249K$331K$398K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$13K$17K$21K
Total$716K$1.1M$1.4M$1.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 34 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.9%-18.8%-7.0%0.7%
P79
Net-to-Gross30.9%24.3%31.9%39.1%
P44
Occupancy88.1%29.8%42.9%56.0%
P97
Rev/Bed$378K$369K$819K$1.4M
P26
Exp/Bed$371K$447K$1.0M$1.3M
P18

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML