Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PRAIRIE VIEW INC. 2026-04-26 14:08 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PRAIRIE VIEW INC.
CCN 174016 | KS | 30 beds | Current EBITDA $-8.4M → Pro Forma $-7.6M (+$781K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$14.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-8.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$781K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-7.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$569K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$781K
Modeled Uplift
$479K
Risk-Adjusted
-$302K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Payer Diversity. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$297K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$294K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$180K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$781K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$297K$297K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$286K$8K$294K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$46K$135K$180K$569K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT81.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$74K$148K$223K$297K$297K$297K$297K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$73K$147K$220K$294K$294K$294K$294K
A/R Days Reduction$0$60K$120K$180K$180K$180K$180K$180K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$213K$425K$633K$781K$781K$781K$781K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $781K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-8.4M$-8.4M-56.4%
Year 1$-8.6M+$520K$-8.1M-54.6%
Year 2$-8.9M+$781K$-8.1M-54.6%
Year 3$-9.1M+$781K$-8.4M-56.4%
Year 4$-9.4M+$781K$-8.6M-58.2%
Year 5$-9.7M+$781K$-8.9M-60.1%
$-83.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$-98.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$-14.4M
Value Created
$-8.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-13.3M
Organic Growth
$7.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-8.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$148K$223K$297K$356K
Denial Rate Reductio$147K$220K$294K$353K
A/R Days Reduction$90K$135K$180K$217K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$390K$585K$781K$937K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 113 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-31.3%-19.6%-7.8%
P0
Net-to-Gross73.8%42.1%58.0%81.3%
P67
Occupancy33.5%19.5%28.9%45.9%
P58
Rev/Bed$494K$406K$639K$1.1M
P33
Exp/Bed$773K$506K$856K$1.2M
P46

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML