Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LARNED STATE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 08:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LARNED STATE HOSPITAL
CCN 174006 | KS | 99 beds | Current EBITDA $1.2M → Pro Forma $2.0M (+$790K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$15.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$790K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$576K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$790K
Modeled Uplift
$515K
Risk-Adjusted
-$275K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$300K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$297K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$183K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$790K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$300K$300K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$289K$8K$297K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$46K$137K$183K$576K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$75K$150K$225K$300K$300K$300K$300K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$74K$149K$223K$297K$297K$297K$297K
A/R Days Reduction$0$61K$122K$183K$183K$183K$183K$183K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$215K$430K$640K$790K$790K$790K$790K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $790K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.0x63% / 11.5x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.7x71% / 14.5x
9.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x
10.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.7x60% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x
11.0x45% / 6.4x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x
12.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.4x
Headroom (turns)
21%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 21% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.1x, adding 3.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.2M$1.2M8.0%
Year 1$1.2M+$526K$1.8M11.7%
Year 2$1.3M+$790K$2.1M13.7%
Year 3$1.3M+$790K$2.1M14.0%
Year 4$1.4M+$790K$2.1M14.3%
Year 5$1.4M+$790K$2.2M14.5%
$12.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$24.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$12.0M
Value Created
$2.2M
Exit EBITDA
$1.9M
Organic Growth
$7.9M
RCM Value Creation
$2.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$150K$225K$300K$360K
Denial Rate Reductio$149K$223K$297K$357K
A/R Days Reduction$91K$137K$183K$219K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$395K$592K$790K$948K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 23 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-18.2%-7.9%0.7%
P0
Net-to-Gross16.9%25.1%30.9%40.7%
P4
Occupancy48.3%36.9%44.2%53.2%
P61
Rev/Bed$152K$330K$900K$1.3M
P4
Exp/Bed$1.1M$399K$1.1M$1.5M
P48

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML