Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KANSAS REHABILITATION HOSPITAL A JO 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KANSAS REHABILITATION HOSPITAL A JO
CCN 173025 | KS | 57 beds | Current EBITDA $-380K → Pro Forma $607K (+$988K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$18.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-380K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$988K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$607K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$720K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$988K
Modeled Uplift
$684K
Risk-Adjusted
-$304K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$376K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$372K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$228K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$12K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$988K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$376K$376K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$361K$10K$372K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$58K$171K$228K$720K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$12K$12K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$94K$188K$282K$376K$376K$376K$376K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$93K$186K$279K$372K$372K$372K$372K
A/R Days Reduction$0$76K$152K$228K$228K$228K$228K$228K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K
Cumulative$0$269K$538K$801K$988K$988K$988K$988K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $988K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-5.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
11.8x
Headroom (turns)
181%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 181% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -5.3x, adding 104.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-380K$-380K-2.0%
Year 1$-392K+$659K$267K1.4%
Year 2$-403K+$988K$584K3.1%
Year 3$-416K+$988K$572K3.0%
Year 4$-428K+$988K$560K3.0%
Year 5$-441K+$988K$547K2.9%
$-3.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$6.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$9.8M
Value Created
$547K
Exit EBITDA
$-606K
Organic Growth
$9.9M
RCM Value Creation
$547K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$188K$282K$376K$451K
Denial Rate Reductio$186K$279K$372K$446K
A/R Days Reduction$114K$171K$228K$274K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$12K$14K
Total$494K$741K$988K$1.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 39 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-2.0%-21.7%-7.9%0.7%
P64
Net-to-Gross60.0%27.9%33.0%41.1%
P87
Occupancy64.2%27.1%35.5%53.2%
P85
Rev/Bed$329K$404K$829K$1.4M
P15
Exp/Bed$336K$506K$1.1M$1.5M
P8

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML