Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SSH - WICHITA INC. 2026-04-26 12:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SSH - WICHITA INC.
CCN 172007 | KS | 48 beds | Current EBITDA $-663K → Pro Forma $585K (+$1.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$23.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-663K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$585K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$910K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$1.2M
Modeled Uplift
$914K
Risk-Adjusted
-$335K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$475K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$470K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$289K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$15K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$475K$475K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$457K$13K$470K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$73K$216K$289K$910K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$15K$15K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT76.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$119K$237K$356K$475K$475K$475K$475K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$117K$235K$352K$470K$470K$470K$470K
A/R Days Reduction$0$96K$193K$289K$289K$289K$289K$289K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K
Cumulative$0$340K$680K$1.0M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-9.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
16.1x
Headroom (turns)
248%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 248% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -9.6x, adding 108.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-663K$-663K-2.8%
Year 1$-683K+$832K$149K0.6%
Year 2$-704K+$1.2M$545K2.3%
Year 3$-725K+$1.2M$524K2.2%
Year 4$-747K+$1.2M$502K2.1%
Year 5$-769K+$1.2M$479K2.0%
$-6.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$5.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$11.9M
Value Created
$479K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.1M
Organic Growth
$12.5M
RCM Value Creation
$479K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$237K$356K$475K$570K
Denial Rate Reductio$235K$352K$470K$564K
A/R Days Reduction$144K$217K$289K$347K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$11K$15K$18K
Total$624K$936K$1.2M$1.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 74 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-2.8%-28.0%-17.4%-5.4%
P77
Net-to-Gross13.1%33.1%51.7%76.3%
P1
Occupancy80.1%19.9%33.4%56.0%
P95
Rev/Bed$494K$358K$570K$1.0M
P42
Exp/Bed$508K$398K$745K$1.2M
P35

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML