Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FREDONIA REGIONAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:09 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FREDONIA REGIONAL HOSPITAL
CCN 171374 | KS | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.7M → Pro Forma $-3.1M (+$579K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$10.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$579K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-3.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+531bps
Margin Improvement
$418K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

58%
Realization (C)
$579K
Modeled Uplift
$338K
Risk-Adjusted
-$241K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 58% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$218K
+200bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$218K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$133K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+9bp
Total EBITDA Impact$579K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$210K$8K$218K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$218K$218K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$33K$99K$133K$418K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT81.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$55K$109K$164K$218K$218K$218K$218K
Cost to Collect$0$55K$109K$164K$218K$218K$218K$218K
A/R Days Reduction$0$44K$88K$133K$133K$133K$133K$133K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$158K$316K$470K$579K$579K$579K$579K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $579K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.7M$-3.7M-33.6%
Year 1$-3.8M+$386K$-3.4M-31.0%
Year 2$-3.9M+$579K$-3.3M-30.3%
Year 3$-4.0M+$579K$-3.4M-31.4%
Year 4$-4.1M+$579K$-3.5M-32.5%
Year 5$-4.2M+$579K$-3.7M-33.6%
$-36.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-40.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$-3.7M
Value Created
$-3.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-5.8M
Organic Growth
$5.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-3.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$109K$164K$218K$262K
Cost to Collect$109K$164K$218K$262K
A/R Days Reduction$66K$100K$133K$159K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$289K$434K$579K$694K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 111 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-33.6%-31.3%-20.5%-9.9%
P20
Net-to-Gross59.7%42.3%58.6%81.4%
P53
Occupancy8.2%18.1%27.0%41.1%
P4
Rev/Bed$436K$456K$731K$1.3M
P23
Exp/Bed$583K$556K$913K$1.3M
P26

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML