Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HODGEMAN COUNTY HEALTH CENTER 2026-04-26 11:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HODGEMAN COUNTY HEALTH CENTER
CCN 171369 | KS | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.3M → Pro Forma $-828K (+$516K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$9.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$516K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-828K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+533bps
Margin Improvement
$372K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$516K
Modeled Uplift
$357K
Risk-Adjusted
-$159K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$195K
+201bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$194K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$118K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+10bp
Total EBITDA Impact$516K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$187K$8K$195K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$194K$194K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$30K$88K$118K$372K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT81.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$49K$97K$146K$195K$195K$195K$195K
Cost to Collect$0$48K$97K$145K$194K$194K$194K$194K
A/R Days Reduction$0$39K$79K$118K$118K$118K$118K$118K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$141K$282K$419K$516K$516K$516K$516K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $516K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.3M$-1.3M-13.9%
Year 1$-1.4M+$344K$-1.0M-10.7%
Year 2$-1.4M+$516K$-910K-9.4%
Year 3$-1.5M+$516K$-952K-9.8%
Year 4$-1.5M+$516K$-996K-10.3%
Year 5$-1.6M+$516K$-1.0M-10.8%
$-13.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$-11.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$2.0M
Value Created
$-1.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-2.1M
Organic Growth
$5.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-1.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$97K$146K$195K$234K
Cost to Collect$97K$145K$194K$233K
A/R Days Reduction$59K$88K$118K$141K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$258K$387K$516K$619K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 111 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-13.9%-31.3%-20.5%-9.9%
P67
Net-to-Gross89.3%42.3%58.6%81.4%
P84
Occupancy71.0%18.1%27.0%41.1%
P90
Rev/Bed$388K$456K$731K$1.3M
P19
Exp/Bed$441K$556K$913K$1.3M
P18

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML