Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HILLSBORO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:30 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HILLSBORO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
CCN 171357 | KS | 15 beds | Current EBITDA $-306K → Pro Forma $184K (+$491K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$9.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-306K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$491K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$184K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+534bps
Margin Improvement
$353K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$491K
Modeled Uplift
$307K
Risk-Adjusted
-$183K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$185K
+201bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$184K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$112K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+10bp
Total EBITDA Impact$491K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$177K$8K$185K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$184K$184K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$28K$84K$112K$353K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT85.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$46K$93K$139K$185K$185K$185K$185K
Cost to Collect$0$46K$92K$138K$184K$184K$184K$184K
A/R Days Reduction$0$37K$75K$112K$112K$112K$112K$112K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$134K$269K$398K$491K$491K$491K$491K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $491K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-14.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
20.6x
Headroom (turns)
317%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 317% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -14.1x, adding 113.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-306K$-306K-3.3%
Year 1$-316K+$327K$11K0.1%
Year 2$-325K+$491K$165K1.8%
Year 3$-335K+$491K$156K1.7%
Year 4$-345K+$491K$146K1.6%
Year 5$-355K+$491K$135K1.5%
$-3.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$4.6M
Value Created
$135K
Exit EBITDA
$-488K
Organic Growth
$4.9M
RCM Value Creation
$135K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$93K$139K$185K$222K
Cost to Collect$92K$138K$184K$221K
A/R Days Reduction$56K$84K$112K$134K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$245K$368K$491K$589K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 100 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.3%-31.3%-20.8%-12.4%
P89
Net-to-Gross68.3%52.2%62.4%85.5%
P54
Occupancy25.9%18.0%26.8%40.2%
P47
Rev/Bed$613K$452K$676K$1.2M
P44
Exp/Bed$633K$566K$889K$1.3M
P30

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML