Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DECATUR COUNTY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DECATUR COUNTY HOSPITAL
CCN 171352 | KS | 18 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.3M → Pro Forma $-2.9M (+$433K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$8.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$433K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-2.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+536bps
Margin Improvement
$310K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$433K
Modeled Uplift
$262K
Risk-Adjusted
-$171K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$164K
+203bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$162K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$98K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+12bp
Total EBITDA Impact$433K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$156K$8K$164K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$162K$162K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$25K$74K$98K$310K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT83.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$41K$82K$123K$164K$164K$164K$164K
Cost to Collect$0$40K$81K$121K$162K$162K$162K$162K
A/R Days Reduction$0$33K$66K$98K$98K$98K$98K$98K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$119K$238K$352K$433K$433K$433K$433K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $433K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.3M$-3.3M-41.1%
Year 1$-3.4M+$289K$-3.1M-38.8%
Year 2$-3.5M+$433K$-3.1M-38.3%
Year 3$-3.6M+$433K$-3.2M-39.6%
Year 4$-3.7M+$433K$-3.3M-40.9%
Year 5$-3.9M+$433K$-3.4M-42.3%
$-33.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$-37.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$-4.4M
Value Created
$-3.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-5.3M
Organic Growth
$4.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-3.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$82K$123K$164K$197K
Cost to Collect$81K$121K$162K$194K
A/R Days Reduction$49K$74K$98K$118K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$217K$325K$433K$520K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 105 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-41.1%-31.3%-20.7%-11.7%
P12
Net-to-Gross81.5%50.5%61.3%83.2%
P70
Occupancy15.7%18.1%27.0%39.4%
P16
Rev/Bed$449K$460K$731K$1.3M
P23
Exp/Bed$634K$583K$932K$1.4M
P30

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML