Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — RUSSELL REGIONAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:34 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — RUSSELL REGIONAL HOSPITAL
CCN 171350 | KS | 21 beds | Current EBITDA $-5.0M → Pro Forma $-4.1M (+$923K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$17.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-5.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$923K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-4.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$673K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$923K
Modeled Uplift
$586K
Risk-Adjusted
-$338K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$351K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$348K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$214K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$923K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$351K$351K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$338K$10K$348K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$54K$160K$214K$673K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT82.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$88K$176K$263K$351K$351K$351K$351K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$87K$174K$261K$348K$348K$348K$348K
A/R Days Reduction$0$71K$142K$214K$214K$214K$214K$214K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$251K$503K$749K$923K$923K$923K$923K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $923K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-5.0M$-5.0M-28.4%
Year 1$-5.1M+$616K$-4.5M-25.8%
Year 2$-5.3M+$923K$-4.4M-24.9%
Year 3$-5.5M+$923K$-4.5M-25.8%
Year 4$-5.6M+$923K$-4.7M-26.7%
Year 5$-5.8M+$923K$-4.9M-27.7%
$-49.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$-53.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$-3.6M
Value Created
$-4.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-7.9M
Organic Growth
$9.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-4.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$176K$263K$351K$421K
Denial Rate Reductio$174K$261K$348K$417K
A/R Days Reduction$107K$160K$214K$256K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$8K$11K$13K
Total$462K$693K$923K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 109 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-28.4%-30.8%-20.7%-11.7%
P31
Net-to-Gross59.4%49.1%60.2%82.0%
P46
Occupancy26.5%18.0%27.0%40.2%
P48
Rev/Bed$836K$453K$731K$1.3M
P57
Exp/Bed$1.1M$570K$926K$1.4M
P60

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML