Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FW HUSTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 19:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FW HUSTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 171314 | KS | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-333K → Pro Forma $62K (+$395K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$7.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-333K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$395K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$62K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+539bps
Margin Improvement
$282K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$395K
Modeled Uplift
$237K
Risk-Adjusted
-$158K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Payer Diversity. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$150K
+204bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$147K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$89K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+13bp
Total EBITDA Impact$395K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$141K$8K$150K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$147K$147K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$23K$67K$89K$282K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT81.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$37K$75K$112K$150K$150K$150K$150K
Cost to Collect$0$37K$73K$110K$147K$147K$147K$147K
A/R Days Reduction$0$30K$60K$89K$89K$89K$89K$89K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$109K$217K$321K$395K$395K$395K$395K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $395K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-45.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
51.9x
Headroom (turns)
798%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 798% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -45.4x, adding 144.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-333K$-333K-4.5%
Year 1$-343K+$264K$-80K-1.1%
Year 2$-353K+$395K$42K0.6%
Year 3$-364K+$395K$31K0.4%
Year 4$-375K+$395K$20K0.3%
Year 5$-386K+$395K$9K0.1%
$-3.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$99K
Exit EV (11x)
$3.4M
Value Created
$9K
Exit EBITDA
$-531K
Organic Growth
$4.0M
RCM Value Creation
$9K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$75K$112K$150K$179K
Cost to Collect$73K$110K$147K$176K
A/R Days Reduction$45K$67K$89K$107K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$198K$296K$395K$474K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 111 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.5%-31.3%-20.5%-9.9%
P84
Net-to-Gross76.3%42.3%58.6%81.4%
P70
Occupancy8.8%18.1%27.0%41.1%
P5
Rev/Bed$294K$456K$731K$1.3M
P12
Exp/Bed$307K$556K$913K$1.3M
P6

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML