Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — JEWELL COUNTY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:09 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — JEWELL COUNTY HOSPITAL
CCN 171309 | KS | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.6M → Pro Forma $-1.2M (+$349K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$6.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$349K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-1.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+542bps
Margin Improvement
$247K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$349K
Modeled Uplift
$216K
Risk-Adjusted
-$133K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Payer Diversity. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$132K
+205bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$129K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$78K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+15bp
Total EBITDA Impact$349K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$124K$8K$132K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$129K$129K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$20K$59K$78K$247K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT81.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$33K$66K$99K$132K$132K$132K$132K
Cost to Collect$0$32K$64K$97K$129K$129K$129K$129K
A/R Days Reduction$0$26K$52K$78K$78K$78K$78K$78K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$96K$193K$284K$349K$349K$349K$349K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $349K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.6M$-1.6M-24.2%
Year 1$-1.6M+$233K$-1.4M-21.3%
Year 2$-1.7M+$349K$-1.3M-20.3%
Year 3$-1.7M+$349K$-1.4M-21.1%
Year 4$-1.8M+$349K$-1.4M-21.9%
Year 5$-1.8M+$349K$-1.5M-22.7%
$-15.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-16.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$-457K
Value Created
$-1.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-2.5M
Organic Growth
$3.5M
RCM Value Creation
$-1.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$66K$99K$132K$159K
Cost to Collect$64K$97K$129K$155K
A/R Days Reduction$39K$59K$78K$94K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$175K$262K$349K$419K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 111 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-24.2%-31.3%-20.5%-9.9%
P39
Net-to-Gross100.0%42.3%58.6%81.4%
P89
Occupancy41.4%18.1%27.0%41.1%
P75
Rev/Bed$258K$456K$731K$1.3M
P8
Exp/Bed$320K$556K$913K$1.3M
P8

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML