Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — RAWLINS COUNTY HEALTH CENTER 2026-04-26 09:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — RAWLINS COUNTY HEALTH CENTER
CCN 171307 | KS | 15 beds | Current EBITDA $-2.4M → Pro Forma $-1.9M (+$455K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$8.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-2.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$455K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-1.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+535bps
Margin Improvement
$326K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$455K
Modeled Uplift
$279K
Risk-Adjusted
-$176K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$172K
+202bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$170K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$103K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+11bp
Total EBITDA Impact$455K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$164K$8K$172K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$170K$170K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$26K$77K$103K$326K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT85.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$43K$86K$129K$172K$172K$172K$172K
Cost to Collect$0$42K$85K$127K$170K$170K$170K$170K
A/R Days Reduction$0$34K$69K$103K$103K$103K$103K$103K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$125K$249K$369K$455K$455K$455K$455K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $455K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-2.4M$-2.4M-28.0%
Year 1$-2.5M+$303K$-2.1M-25.3%
Year 2$-2.5M+$455K$-2.1M-24.4%
Year 3$-2.6M+$455K$-2.1M-25.3%
Year 4$-2.7M+$455K$-2.2M-26.2%
Year 5$-2.8M+$455K$-2.3M-27.1%
$-23.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-25.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$-1.6M
Value Created
$-2.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-3.8M
Organic Growth
$4.5M
RCM Value Creation
$-2.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$86K$129K$172K$206K
Cost to Collect$85K$127K$170K$204K
A/R Days Reduction$52K$78K$103K$124K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$227K$341K$455K$546K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 100 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-28.0%-31.3%-20.8%-12.4%
P34
Net-to-Gross76.4%52.2%62.4%85.5%
P65
Occupancy19.9%18.0%26.8%40.2%
P31
Rev/Bed$567K$452K$676K$1.2M
P37
Exp/Bed$725K$566K$889K$1.3M
P38

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML