Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ASHLAND HEALTH CENTER 2026-04-26 09:33 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ASHLAND HEALTH CENTER
CCN 171304 | KS | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-2.4M → Pro Forma $-1.9M (+$492K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$9.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-2.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$492K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-1.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+534bps
Margin Improvement
$354K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$492K
Modeled Uplift
$323K
Risk-Adjusted
-$169K
Execution Discount
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$186K
+201bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$184K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$112K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+10bp
Total EBITDA Impact$492K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$177K$8K$186K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$184K$184K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$28K$84K$112K$354K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT81.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$46K$93K$139K$186K$186K$186K$186K
Cost to Collect$0$46K$92K$138K$184K$184K$184K$184K
A/R Days Reduction$0$37K$75K$112K$112K$112K$112K$112K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$135K$269K$399K$492K$492K$492K$492K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $492K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-2.4M$-2.4M-25.5%
Year 1$-2.4M+$328K$-2.1M-22.7%
Year 2$-2.5M+$492K$-2.0M-21.8%
Year 3$-2.6M+$492K$-2.1M-22.6%
Year 4$-2.6M+$492K$-2.2M-23.4%
Year 5$-2.7M+$492K$-2.2M-24.3%
$-23.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$-24.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$-1.1M
Value Created
$-2.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-3.7M
Organic Growth
$4.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-2.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$93K$139K$186K$223K
Cost to Collect$92K$138K$184K$221K
A/R Days Reduction$56K$84K$112K$135K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$246K$369K$492K$590K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 111 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-25.5%-31.3%-20.5%-9.9%
P38
Net-to-Gross100.0%42.3%58.6%81.4%
P89
Occupancy58.3%18.1%27.0%41.1%
P82
Rev/Bed$369K$456K$731K$1.3M
P18
Exp/Bed$463K$556K$913K$1.3M
P21

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML