Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LANE COUNTY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 17:21 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LANE COUNTY HOSPITAL
CCN 171303 | KS | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.2M → Pro Forma $-835K (+$368K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$6.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$368K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-835K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+540bps
Margin Improvement
$261K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$368K
Modeled Uplift
$251K
Risk-Adjusted
-$117K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$139K
+205bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$136K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$83K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+14bp
Total EBITDA Impact$368K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$131K$8K$139K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$136K$136K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$21K$62K$83K$261K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT81.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$35K$70K$105K$139K$139K$139K$139K
Cost to Collect$0$34K$68K$102K$136K$136K$136K$136K
A/R Days Reduction$0$28K$55K$83K$83K$83K$83K$83K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$101K$203K$299K$368K$368K$368K$368K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $368K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.2M$-1.2M-17.7%
Year 1$-1.2M+$246K$-994K-14.6%
Year 2$-1.3M+$368K$-909K-13.3%
Year 3$-1.3M+$368K$-947K-13.9%
Year 4$-1.4M+$368K$-987K-14.5%
Year 5$-1.4M+$368K$-1.0M-15.1%
$-12.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$-11.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$739K
Value Created
$-1.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-1.9M
Organic Growth
$3.7M
RCM Value Creation
$-1.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$70K$105K$139K$167K
Cost to Collect$68K$102K$136K$164K
A/R Days Reduction$41K$62K$83K$100K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$184K$276K$368K$442K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 111 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-17.7%-31.3%-20.5%-9.9%
P57
Net-to-Gross100.0%42.3%58.6%81.4%
P89
Occupancy71.2%18.1%27.0%41.1%
P92
Rev/Bed$273K$456K$731K$1.3M
P10
Exp/Bed$321K$556K$913K$1.3M
P9

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML