Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 06:49 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 170197 | KS | 58 beds | Current EBITDA $1.9M → Pro Forma $5.0M (+$3.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$59.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$3.1M
Modeled Uplift
$2.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.0M (vs $3.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$720K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$38K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.2M$1.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.1M$33K$1.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$182K$538K$720K$2.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$38K$38K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$296K$592K$887K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$293K$586K$878K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$240K$480K$720K$720K$720K$720K$720K
Clean Claim Rate$0$19K$38K$38K$38K$38K$38K$38K
Cumulative$0$847K$1.7M$2.5M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x77% / 17.4x81% / 19.7x86% / 22.0x87% / 23.1x89% / 24.3x
9.0x72% / 15.1x77% / 17.1x81% / 19.2x82% / 20.2x84% / 21.2x
10.0x68% / 13.3x72% / 15.1x76% / 16.9x78% / 17.9x80% / 18.8x
11.0x64% / 11.8x68% / 13.4x72% / 15.1x74% / 15.9x76% / 16.8x
12.0x60% / 10.5x64% / 12.1x68% / 13.6x70% / 14.3x72% / 15.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.3x
Headroom (turns)
51%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 51% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.2x, adding 5.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.9M$1.9M3.2%
Year 1$1.9M+$2.1M$4.0M6.8%
Year 2$2.0M+$3.1M$5.1M8.6%
Year 3$2.0M+$3.1M$5.2M8.7%
Year 4$2.1M+$3.1M$5.2M8.8%
Year 5$2.2M+$3.1M$5.3M8.9%
$18.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$58.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$39.4M
Value Created
$5.3M
Exit EBITDA
$3.0M
Organic Growth
$31.1M
RCM Value Creation
$5.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$592K$887K$1.2M$1.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$586K$878K$1.2M$1.4M
A/R Days Reduction$360K$540K$720K$864K
Clean Claim Rate$19K$28K$38K$45K
Total$1.6M$2.3M$3.1M$3.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 39 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.2%-21.7%-7.9%0.7%
P82
Net-to-Gross38.2%27.9%33.0%41.1%
P67
Occupancy42.4%27.1%35.5%53.2%
P56
Rev/Bed$1.0M$404K$829K$1.4M
P62
Exp/Bed$988K$506K$1.1M$1.5M
P41

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML