Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MANHATTAN SURGICAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MANHATTAN SURGICAL HOSPITAL
CCN 170190 | KS | 13 beds | Current EBITDA $5.5M → Pro Forma $7.7M (+$2.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$42.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$2.2M
Modeled Uplift
$1.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$824K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.4M (vs $2.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$841K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$832K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$512K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$27K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$841K$841K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$809K$23K$832K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$129K$383K$512K$1.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$27K$27K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT87.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$210K$420K$631K$841K$841K$841K$841K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$208K$416K$624K$832K$832K$832K$832K
A/R Days Reduction$0$171K$341K$512K$512K$512K$512K$512K
Clean Claim Rate$0$13K$27K$27K$27K$27K$27K$27K
Cumulative$0$602K$1.2M$1.8M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.7x63% / 11.3x64% / 12.0x
9.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x
10.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x
11.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.8x
12.0x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.5x
Headroom (turns)
7%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 7% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.0x, adding 2.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.5M$5.5M13.1%
Year 1$5.7M+$1.5M$7.1M17.0%
Year 2$5.8M+$2.2M$8.1M19.1%
Year 3$6.0M+$2.2M$8.2M19.6%
Year 4$6.2M+$2.2M$8.4M20.0%
Year 5$6.4M+$2.2M$8.6M20.4%
$55.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$94.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$39.5M
Value Created
$8.6M
Exit EBITDA
$8.8M
Organic Growth
$22.1M
RCM Value Creation
$8.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$420K$631K$841K$1.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$416K$624K$832K$999K
A/R Days Reduction$256K$384K$512K$614K
Clean Claim Rate$13K$20K$27K$32K
Total$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 97 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin13.1%-31.3%-20.7%-12.7%
P97
Net-to-Gross26.5%53.2%62.4%87.1%
P2
Occupancy13.5%18.0%26.5%40.2%
P12
Rev/Bed$3.2M$446K$666K$1.1M
P98
Exp/Bed$2.8M$554K$866K$1.3M
P96

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML