Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ADVENTHEALTH SHAWNEE MISSION 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ADVENTHEALTH SHAWNEE MISSION
CCN 170104 | KS | 317 beds | Current EBITDA $595K → Pro Forma $29.8M (+$29.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$555.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$595K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$29.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$29.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$21.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$29.2M
Modeled Uplift
$19.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$9.5M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $19.8M (vs $29.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$11.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$11.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$356K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$29.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$11.1M$11.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$10.7M$306K$11.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.7M$5.1M$6.8M$21.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$356K$356K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT33.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.8M$5.6M$8.3M$11.1M$11.1M$11.1M$11.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.8M$5.5M$8.3M$11.0M$11.0M$11.0M$11.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.3M$4.5M$6.8M$6.8M$6.8M$6.8M$6.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$178K$356K$356K$356K$356K$356K$356K
Cumulative$0$8.0M$15.9M$23.7M$29.2M$29.2M$29.2M$29.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $29.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x225% / 364.6x232% / 405.5x239% / 446.4x242% / 466.8x245% / 487.3x
9.0x218% / 323.8x225% / 360.1x231% / 396.4x234% / 414.6x237% / 432.8x
10.0x211% / 291.1x218% / 323.8x224% / 356.5x227% / 372.8x230% / 389.2x
11.0x205% / 264.3x212% / 294.0x218% / 323.8x221% / 338.6x223% / 353.5x
12.0x200% / 242.0x206% / 269.3x212% / 296.5x215% / 310.1x218% / 323.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.3x
Headroom (turns)
97%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 97% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.2x, adding 8.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$595K$595K0.1%
Year 1$613K+$19.5M$20.1M3.6%
Year 2$631K+$29.2M$29.9M5.4%
Year 3$650K+$29.2M$29.9M5.4%
Year 4$670K+$29.2M$29.9M5.4%
Year 5$690K+$29.2M$29.9M5.4%
$5.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$329.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$323.3M
Value Created
$29.9M
Exit EBITDA
$948K
Organic Growth
$292.4M
RCM Value Creation
$29.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.6M$8.3M$11.1M$13.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.5M$8.3M$11.0M$13.2M
A/R Days Reduction$3.4M$5.1M$6.8M$8.1M
Clean Claim Rate$178K$267K$356K$427K
Total$14.6M$21.9M$29.2M$35.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 8 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.1%-14.1%-4.2%5.9%
P62
Net-to-Gross19.5%18.5%21.8%27.6%
P25
Occupancy57.7%41.4%51.6%62.8%
P50
Rev/Bed$1.8M$1.2M$1.3M$1.7M
P75
Exp/Bed$1.8M$1.0M$1.3M$1.8M
P62

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML