Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — STORMONT-VAIL REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — STORMONT-VAIL REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER
CCN 170086 | KS | 438 beds | Current EBITDA $-16.3M → Pro Forma $27.1M (+$43.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$825.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-16.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$43.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$27.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$31.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$43.4M
Modeled Uplift
$29.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$14.4M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $29.0M (vs $43.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$16.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$16.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$10.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$528K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$43.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$16.5M$16.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$15.9M$454K$16.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.5M$7.5M$10.0M$31.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$528K$528K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$4.1M$8.2M$12.4M$16.5M$16.5M$16.5M$16.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$4.1M$8.2M$12.3M$16.3M$16.3M$16.3M$16.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.3M$6.7M$10.0M$10.0M$10.0M$10.0M$10.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$264K$528K$528K$528K$528K$528K$528K
Cumulative$0$11.8M$23.6M$35.2M$43.4M$43.4M$43.4M$43.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $43.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-5.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
11.6x
Headroom (turns)
179%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 179% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -5.1x, adding 104.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-16.3M$-16.3M-2.0%
Year 1$-16.8M+$28.9M$12.1M1.5%
Year 2$-17.3M+$43.4M$26.1M3.2%
Year 3$-17.9M+$43.4M$25.5M3.1%
Year 4$-18.4M+$43.4M$25.0M3.0%
Year 5$-19.0M+$43.4M$24.5M3.0%
$-163.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$269.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$432.4M
Value Created
$24.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-26.0M
Organic Growth
$434.0M
RCM Value Creation
$24.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$8.2M$12.4M$16.5M$19.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$8.2M$12.3M$16.3M$19.6M
A/R Days Reduction$5.0M$7.5M$10.0M$12.0M
Clean Claim Rate$264K$396K$528K$634K
Total$21.7M$32.6M$43.4M$52.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 1064 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-2.0%-13.5%-3.8%5.0%
P55
Net-to-Gross30.2%18.9%25.4%32.6%
P67
Occupancy59.7%60.6%71.3%79.5%
P24
Rev/Bed$1.9M$1.2M$1.6M$2.1M
P67
Exp/Bed$1.9M$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M
P65

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML