Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 02:17 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HOSPITAL
CCN 170040 | KS | 955 beds | Current EBITDA $-993.3M → Pro Forma $-857.3M (+$136.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$2.58B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-993.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$136.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-857.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$99.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$136.0M
Modeled Uplift
$91.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$44.9M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $91.0M (vs $136.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$51.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$51.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$31.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$1.7M
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$136.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$51.7M$51.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$49.8M$1.4M$51.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$7.9M$23.5M$31.5M$99.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$1.7M$1.7M$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$12.9M$25.8M$38.8M$51.7M$51.7M$51.7M$51.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$12.8M$25.6M$38.4M$51.2M$51.2M$51.2M$51.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$10.5M$21.0M$31.5M$31.5M$31.5M$31.5M$31.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$827K$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
Cumulative$0$37.0M$74.1M$110.3M$136.0M$136.0M$136.0M$136.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $136.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-993.3M$-993.3M-38.4%
Year 1$-1.02B+$90.7M$-932.5M-36.1%
Year 2$-1.05B+$136.0M$-917.8M-35.5%
Year 3$-1.09B+$136.0M$-949.5M-36.7%
Year 4$-1.12B+$136.0M$-982.0M-38.0%
Year 5$-1.15B+$136.0M$-1.02B-39.3%
$-9.93B
Entry EV (10x)
$-11.17B
Exit EV (11x)
$-1.24B
Value Created
$-1.02B
Exit EBITDA
$-1.58B
Organic Growth
$1.36B
RCM Value Creation
$-1.02B
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$25.8M$38.8M$51.7M$62.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$25.6M$38.4M$51.2M$61.4M
A/R Days Reduction$15.7M$23.6M$31.5M$37.7M
Clean Claim Rate$827K$1.2M$1.7M$2.0M
Total$68.0M$102.0M$136.0M$163.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 293 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-38.4%-15.0%-4.3%4.1%
P6
Net-to-Gross20.0%20.5%26.5%31.5%
P22
Occupancy77.0%68.3%77.0%84.5%
P50
Rev/Bed$2.7M$1.5M$1.9M$2.6M
P79
Exp/Bed$3.7M$1.4M$2.0M$2.8M
P89

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML