Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PRATT REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:24 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PRATT REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 170027 | KS | 35 beds | Current EBITDA $-8.8M → Pro Forma $-6.2M (+$2.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$49.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-8.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-6.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$2.6M
Modeled Uplift
$1.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$920K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.7M (vs $2.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$994K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$984K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$605K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$32K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$994K$994K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$957K$27K$984K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$152K$452K$605K$1.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$32K$32K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT76.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$248K$497K$745K$994K$994K$994K$994K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$246K$492K$738K$984K$984K$984K$984K
A/R Days Reduction$0$202K$403K$605K$605K$605K$605K$605K
Clean Claim Rate$0$16K$32K$32K$32K$32K$32K$32K
Cumulative$0$712K$1.4M$2.1M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-8.8M$-8.8M-17.7%
Year 1$-9.0M+$1.7M$-7.3M-14.7%
Year 2$-9.3M+$2.6M$-6.7M-13.5%
Year 3$-9.6M+$2.6M$-7.0M-14.0%
Year 4$-9.9M+$2.6M$-7.3M-14.6%
Year 5$-10.2M+$2.6M$-7.6M-15.2%
$-87.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-83.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$4.6M
Value Created
$-7.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-14.0M
Organic Growth
$26.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-7.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$497K$745K$994K$1.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$492K$738K$984K$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$302K$454K$605K$726K
Clean Claim Rate$16K$24K$32K$38K
Total$1.3M$2.0M$2.6M$3.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 99 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-17.7%-30.6%-19.1%-8.4%
P54
Net-to-Gross44.1%38.5%56.2%76.3%
P31
Occupancy33.9%19.8%32.7%49.9%
P54
Rev/Bed$1.4M$390K$639K$1.1M
P81
Exp/Bed$1.7M$456K$856K$1.2M
P85

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML