Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CHEROKEE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CHEROKEE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 161362 | IA | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.2M → Pro Forma $-803K (+$2.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$45.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-803K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$2.4M
Modeled Uplift
$1.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$904K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.5M (vs $2.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$916K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$907K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$557K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$29K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$916K$916K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$882K$25K$907K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$141K$417K$557K$1.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$29K$29K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT61.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$229K$458K$687K$916K$916K$916K$916K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$227K$453K$680K$907K$907K$907K$907K
A/R Days Reduction$0$186K$372K$557K$557K$557K$557K$557K
Clean Claim Rate$0$15K$29K$29K$29K$29K$29K$29K
Cumulative$0$656K$1.3M$2.0M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.2M$-3.2M-7.0%
Year 1$-3.3M+$1.6M$-1.7M-3.7%
Year 2$-3.4M+$2.4M$-998K-2.2%
Year 3$-3.5M+$2.4M$-1.1M-2.4%
Year 4$-3.6M+$2.4M$-1.2M-2.6%
Year 5$-3.7M+$2.4M$-1.3M-2.9%
$-32.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-14.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$17.7M
Value Created
$-1.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-5.1M
Organic Growth
$24.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-1.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$458K$687K$916K$1.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$453K$680K$907K$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$279K$418K$557K$669K
Clean Claim Rate$15K$22K$29K$35K
Total$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 94 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-7.0%-14.5%-8.3%-3.1%
P57
Net-to-Gross63.9%47.2%53.5%61.5%
P82
Occupancy23.4%14.6%20.6%32.9%
P59
Rev/Bed$1.8M$906K$1.3M$1.8M
P73
Exp/Bed$2.0M$971K$1.4M$2.1M
P70

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML