Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MERCYONE OELWEIN MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 19:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MERCYONE OELWEIN MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 161338 | IA | 17 beds | Current EBITDA $-844K → Pro Forma $-116K (+$728K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$13.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-844K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$728K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-116K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+527bps
Margin Improvement
$530K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$728K
Modeled Uplift
$441K
Risk-Adjusted
-$287K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$276K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$274K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$168K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$728K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$276K$276K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$266K$8K$274K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$42K$126K$168K$530K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT61.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$69K$138K$207K$276K$276K$276K$276K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$69K$137K$206K$274K$274K$274K$274K
A/R Days Reduction$0$56K$112K$168K$168K$168K$168K$168K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$198K$397K$590K$728K$728K$728K$728K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $728K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-844K$-844K-6.1%
Year 1$-869K+$485K$-384K-2.8%
Year 2$-895K+$728K$-167K-1.2%
Year 3$-922K+$728K$-194K-1.4%
Year 4$-950K+$728K$-222K-1.6%
Year 5$-978K+$728K$-250K-1.8%
$-8.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$-2.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$5.7M
Value Created
$-250K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.3M
Organic Growth
$7.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-250K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$138K$207K$276K$331K
Denial Rate Reductio$137K$206K$274K$329K
A/R Days Reduction$84K$126K$168K$202K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$364K$546K$728K$874K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 86 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-6.1%-13.1%-8.0%-2.9%
P64
Net-to-Gross43.5%49.5%54.7%61.8%
P9
Occupancy18.9%14.9%20.3%32.2%
P45
Rev/Bed$812K$954K$1.4M$1.9M
P12
Exp/Bed$862K$1.0M$1.5M$2.1M
P13

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML