Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MERCY MEDICAL CENTER - NEW HAMPTON 2026-04-26 17:22 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MERCY MEDICAL CENTER - NEW HAMPTON
CCN 161331 | IA | 11 beds | Current EBITDA $-196K → Pro Forma $839K (+$1.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$19.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-196K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$839K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$754K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$1.0M
Modeled Uplift
$672K
Risk-Adjusted
-$363K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$393K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$389K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$239K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$13K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$393K$393K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$379K$11K$389K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$60K$179K$239K$754K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$13K$13K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT63.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$98K$197K$295K$393K$393K$393K$393K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$97K$195K$292K$389K$389K$389K$389K
A/R Days Reduction$0$80K$160K$239K$239K$239K$239K$239K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K
Cumulative$0$282K$564K$839K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-2.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
8.5x
Headroom (turns)
130%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 130% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -2.0x, adding 101.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-196K$-196K-1.0%
Year 1$-201K+$690K$488K2.5%
Year 2$-208K+$1.0M$827K4.2%
Year 3$-214K+$1.0M$821K4.2%
Year 4$-220K+$1.0M$815K4.1%
Year 5$-227K+$1.0M$808K4.1%
$-2.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$8.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$10.8M
Value Created
$808K
Exit EBITDA
$-312K
Organic Growth
$10.3M
RCM Value Creation
$808K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$197K$295K$393K$472K
Denial Rate Reductio$195K$292K$389K$467K
A/R Days Reduction$120K$180K$239K$287K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$13K$15K
Total$517K$776K$1.0M$1.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 25 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.0%-15.9%-9.0%-2.3%
P76
Net-to-Gross51.2%48.0%54.2%63.8%
P36
Occupancy31.1%15.3%18.6%28.3%
P76
Rev/Bed$1.8M$877K$1.6M$2.0M
P56
Exp/Bed$1.8M$1.0M$1.7M$2.3M
P56

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML