Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — AVERA MERRILL PIONEER HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — AVERA MERRILL PIONEER HOSPITAL
CCN 161321 | IA | 11 beds | Current EBITDA $-883K → Pro Forma $-399K (+$484K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$9.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-883K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$484K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-399K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+534bps
Margin Improvement
$348K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$484K
Modeled Uplift
$291K
Risk-Adjusted
-$193K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$183K
+202bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$181K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$110K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+11bp
Total EBITDA Impact$484K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$175K$8K$183K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$181K$181K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$28K$83K$110K$348K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT63.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$46K$91K$137K$183K$183K$183K$183K
Cost to Collect$0$45K$91K$136K$181K$181K$181K$181K
A/R Days Reduction$0$37K$74K$110K$110K$110K$110K$110K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$133K$265K$393K$484K$484K$484K$484K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $484K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-883K$-883K-9.7%
Year 1$-909K+$323K$-586K-6.5%
Year 2$-936K+$484K$-452K-5.0%
Year 3$-965K+$484K$-480K-5.3%
Year 4$-994K+$484K$-509K-5.6%
Year 5$-1.0M+$484K$-539K-5.9%
$-8.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-5.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$2.9M
Value Created
$-539K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.4M
Organic Growth
$4.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-539K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$91K$137K$183K$219K
Cost to Collect$91K$136K$181K$218K
A/R Days Reduction$55K$83K$110K$132K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$242K$363K$484K$581K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 25 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-9.7%-15.9%-9.0%-2.3%
P44
Net-to-Gross61.7%48.0%54.2%63.8%
P64
Occupancy14.9%15.3%18.6%28.3%
P16
Rev/Bed$825K$877K$1.6M$2.0M
P20
Exp/Bed$905K$1.0M$1.7M$2.3M
P16

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML