Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — COMPASS MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE 2026-04-26 11:55 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — COMPASS MEMORIAL HEALTHCARE
CCN 161317 | IA | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $888K → Pro Forma $2.9M (+$2.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$37.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$888K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$2.0M
Modeled Uplift
$1.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$764K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.2M (vs $2.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$758K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$750K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$461K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$24K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$758K$758K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$730K$21K$750K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$116K$345K$461K$1.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$24K$24K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT61.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$189K$379K$568K$758K$758K$758K$758K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$188K$375K$563K$750K$750K$750K$750K
A/R Days Reduction$0$154K$307K$461K$461K$461K$461K$461K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K
Cumulative$0$543K$1.1M$1.6M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x85% / 21.6x89% / 24.4x94% / 27.2x96% / 28.6x97% / 29.9x
9.0x80% / 18.9x84% / 21.4x89% / 23.8x90% / 25.0x92% / 26.3x
10.0x76% / 16.7x80% / 18.9x84% / 21.1x86% / 22.2x88% / 23.3x
11.0x72% / 14.9x76% / 16.9x80% / 18.9x82% / 19.9x84% / 20.9x
12.0x68% / 13.3x72% / 15.2x76% / 17.0x78% / 18.0x80% / 18.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.9x
Headroom (turns)
60%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 60% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.6x, adding 5.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$888K$888K2.3%
Year 1$914K+$1.3M$2.2M5.9%
Year 2$942K+$2.0M$2.9M7.7%
Year 3$970K+$2.0M$3.0M7.8%
Year 4$999K+$2.0M$3.0M7.9%
Year 5$1.0M+$2.0M$3.0M8.0%
$8.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$33.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$24.4M
Value Created
$3.0M
Exit EBITDA
$1.4M
Organic Growth
$19.9M
RCM Value Creation
$3.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$379K$568K$758K$910K
Denial Rate Reductio$375K$563K$750K$900K
A/R Days Reduction$231K$346K$461K$553K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$18K$24K$29K
Total$997K$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 94 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.3%-14.5%-8.3%-3.1%
P91
Net-to-Gross51.9%47.2%53.5%61.5%
P41
Occupancy18.7%14.6%20.6%32.9%
P44
Rev/Bed$1.5M$906K$1.3M$1.8M
P59
Exp/Bed$1.5M$971K$1.4M$2.1M
P54

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML