Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — JONES REGIONAL MEDICAL CTR 2026-04-26 05:22 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — JONES REGIONAL MEDICAL CTR
CCN 161306 | IA | 10 beds | Current EBITDA $95K → Pro Forma $2.4M (+$2.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$43.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$95K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$2.3M
Modeled Uplift
$1.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$642K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.6M (vs $2.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$871K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$862K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$530K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$28K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$871K$871K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$838K$24K$862K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$134K$396K$530K$1.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$28K$28K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT64.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$218K$435K$653K$871K$871K$871K$871K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$216K$431K$647K$862K$862K$862K$862K
A/R Days Reduction$0$177K$353K$530K$530K$530K$530K$530K
Clean Claim Rate$0$14K$28K$28K$28K$28K$28K$28K
Cumulative$0$624K$1.2M$1.9M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x183% / 180.7x189% / 201.2x195% / 221.6x197% / 231.8x200% / 242.1x
9.0x176% / 160.3x182% / 178.5x188% / 196.6x190% / 205.7x193% / 214.8x
10.0x170% / 143.9x176% / 160.3x181% / 176.6x184% / 184.8x186% / 193.0x
11.0x165% / 130.6x171% / 145.4x176% / 160.3x179% / 167.7x181% / 175.2x
12.0x160% / 119.4x166% / 133.0x171% / 146.7x174% / 153.5x176% / 160.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.2x
Headroom (turns)
95%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 95% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.3x, adding 8.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$95K$95K0.2%
Year 1$98K+$1.5M$1.6M3.7%
Year 2$101K+$2.3M$2.4M5.5%
Year 3$104K+$2.3M$2.4M5.5%
Year 4$107K+$2.3M$2.4M5.5%
Year 5$111K+$2.3M$2.4M5.5%
$954K
Entry EV (10x)
$26.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$25.5M
Value Created
$2.4M
Exit EBITDA
$152K
Organic Growth
$22.9M
RCM Value Creation
$2.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$435K$653K$871K$1.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$431K$647K$862K$1.0M
A/R Days Reduction$265K$397K$530K$636K
Clean Claim Rate$14K$21K$28K$33K
Total$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 20 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.2%-16.0%-6.7%-0.8%
P80
Net-to-Gross53.4%50.3%59.8%64.9%
P35
Occupancy47.5%15.1%18.8%29.0%
P95
Rev/Bed$4.4M$824K$1.6M$2.0M
P95
Exp/Bed$4.3M$986K$1.7M$2.1M
P95

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML