Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — IOWA SPECIALTY HOSPITAL - CLARION 2026-04-26 05:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — IOWA SPECIALTY HOSPITAL - CLARION
CCN 161302 | IA | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $190K → Pro Forma $4.3M (+$4.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$77.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$190K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$4.1M
Modeled Uplift
$2.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.3M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.8M (vs $4.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$940K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$49K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.5M$1.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.5M$43K$1.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$237K$703K$940K$3.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$49K$49K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT61.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$386K$773K$1.2M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$383K$765K$1.1M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$313K$627K$940K$940K$940K$940K$940K
Clean Claim Rate$0$25K$49K$49K$49K$49K$49K$49K
Cumulative$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.3M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x177% / 162.1x183% / 180.5x188% / 198.8x191% / 208.0x193% / 217.2x
9.0x170% / 143.7x176% / 160.0x181% / 176.4x184% / 184.5x186% / 192.7x
10.0x164% / 129.0x170% / 143.7x175% / 158.4x178% / 165.8x180% / 173.1x
11.0x159% / 117.0x165% / 130.4x170% / 143.7x173% / 150.4x175% / 157.1x
12.0x155% / 107.0x160% / 119.2x165% / 131.5x168% / 137.6x170% / 143.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.1x
Headroom (turns)
94%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 94% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.4x, adding 8.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$190K$190K0.2%
Year 1$195K+$2.7M$2.9M3.8%
Year 2$201K+$4.1M$4.3M5.5%
Year 3$207K+$4.1M$4.3M5.5%
Year 4$213K+$4.1M$4.3M5.5%
Year 5$220K+$4.1M$4.3M5.5%
$1.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$47.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$45.2M
Value Created
$4.3M
Exit EBITDA
$302K
Organic Growth
$40.7M
RCM Value Creation
$4.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$773K$1.2M$1.5M$1.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$765K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
A/R Days Reduction$470K$705K$940K$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$25K$37K$49K$59K
Total$2.0M$3.0M$4.1M$4.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 94 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.2%-14.5%-8.3%-3.1%
P85
Net-to-Gross41.2%47.2%53.5%61.5%
P14
Occupancy41.8%14.6%20.6%32.9%
P90
Rev/Bed$3.1M$906K$1.3M$1.8M
P94
Exp/Bed$3.1M$971K$1.4M$2.1M
P91

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML