Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ALLEN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ALLEN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 160110 | IA | 189 beds | Current EBITDA $5.0M → Pro Forma $19.3M (+$14.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$271.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$14.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$19.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$10.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$14.3M
Modeled Uplift
$9.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $9.9M (vs $14.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$174K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$14.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.4M$5.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.2M$149K$5.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$833K$2.5M$3.3M$10.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$174K$174K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT33.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.4M$2.7M$4.1M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.3M$2.7M$4.0M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$87K$174K$174K$174K$174K$174K$174K
Cumulative$0$3.9M$7.8M$11.6M$14.3M$14.3M$14.3M$14.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $14.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x92% / 26.1x97% / 29.3x101% / 32.6x103% / 34.2x105% / 35.8x
9.0x87% / 22.8x91% / 25.7x96% / 28.6x98% / 30.1x99% / 31.5x
10.0x82% / 20.2x87% / 22.8x91% / 25.4x93% / 26.7x95% / 28.0x
11.0x78% / 18.1x83% / 20.4x87% / 22.8x89% / 24.0x91% / 25.2x
12.0x75% / 16.3x79% / 18.5x83% / 20.6x85% / 21.7x87% / 22.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.3x
Headroom (turns)
66%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 66% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.2x, adding 6.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.0M$5.0M1.8%
Year 1$5.2M+$9.5M$14.7M5.4%
Year 2$5.3M+$14.3M$19.6M7.2%
Year 3$5.5M+$14.3M$19.7M7.3%
Year 4$5.6M+$14.3M$19.9M7.3%
Year 5$5.8M+$14.3M$20.1M7.4%
$50.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$220.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$170.8M
Value Created
$20.1M
Exit EBITDA
$8.0M
Organic Growth
$142.7M
RCM Value Creation
$20.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.7M$4.1M$5.4M$6.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.7M$4.0M$5.4M$6.4M
A/R Days Reduction$1.7M$2.5M$3.3M$4.0M
Clean Claim Rate$87K$130K$174K$208K
Total$7.1M$10.7M$14.3M$17.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 17 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.8%-25.8%-14.8%-5.1%
P88
Net-to-Gross33.4%26.0%29.8%33.4%
P71
Occupancy61.1%46.6%56.3%61.1%
P71
Rev/Bed$1.4M$1.0M$1.2M$1.5M
P59
Exp/Bed$1.4M$1.0M$1.4M$2.1M
P53

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML