Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. LUKES METHODIST HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. LUKES METHODIST HOSPITAL
CCN 160045 | IA | 281 beds | Current EBITDA $88.6M → Pro Forma $108.3M (+$19.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$374.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$88.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$19.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$108.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$14.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$19.7M
Modeled Uplift
$13.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $13.4M (vs $19.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$240K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$19.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.5M$7.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.2M$206K$7.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.4M$4.6M$14.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$240K$240K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.9M$3.7M$5.6M$7.5M$7.5M$7.5M$7.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.9M$3.7M$5.6M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$120K$240K$240K$240K$240K$240K$240K
Cumulative$0$5.4M$10.7M$16.0M$19.7M$19.7M$19.7M$19.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $19.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.9x51% / 8.0x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.2x
9.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x
10.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x
11.0x33% / 4.1x38% / 4.9x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.5x
12.0x28% / 3.5x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.4x
Headroom (turns)
-6%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -6% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.9x, adding 1.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$88.6M$88.6M23.6%
Year 1$91.3M+$13.1M$104.4M27.9%
Year 2$94.0M+$19.7M$113.7M30.3%
Year 3$96.8M+$19.7M$116.5M31.1%
Year 4$99.7M+$19.7M$119.4M31.9%
Year 5$102.7M+$19.7M$122.4M32.7%
$886.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.35B
Exit EV (11x)
$460.7M
Value Created
$122.4M
Exit EBITDA
$141.1M
Organic Growth
$197.2M
RCM Value Creation
$122.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.7M$5.6M$7.5M$9.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.7M$5.6M$7.4M$8.9M
A/R Days Reduction$2.3M$3.4M$4.6M$5.5M
Clean Claim Rate$120K$180K$240K$288K
Total$9.9M$14.8M$19.7M$23.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 12 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin23.6%-24.6%-10.2%-2.7%
P92
Net-to-Gross29.9%24.8%29.5%31.8%
P58
Occupancy58.5%51.6%55.6%61.6%
P58
Rev/Bed$1.3M$1.1M$1.3M$1.5M
P50
Exp/Bed$1.0M$1.0M$1.3M$1.7M
P17

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML