Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MERCYONE CEDAR FALLS MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 14:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MERCYONE CEDAR FALLS MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 160040 | IA | 35 beds | Current EBITDA $2.4M → Pro Forma $4.3M (+$1.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$35.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$1.9M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$750K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$716K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$709K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$436K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$23K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$716K$716K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$689K$20K$709K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$110K$326K$436K$1.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$23K$23K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT58.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$179K$358K$537K$716K$716K$716K$716K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$177K$354K$531K$709K$709K$709K$709K
A/R Days Reduction$0$145K$290K$436K$436K$436K$436K$436K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$23K$23K$23K$23K$23K$23K
Cumulative$0$513K$1.0M$1.5M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x61% / 10.9x66% / 12.4x70% / 14.0x71% / 14.8x73% / 15.6x
9.0x56% / 9.3x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.1x66% / 12.8x68% / 13.5x
10.0x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.3x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x
11.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.4x
12.0x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.2x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.7x
Headroom (turns)
26%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 26% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.8x, adding 3.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.4M$2.4M6.8%
Year 1$2.5M+$1.3M$3.8M10.5%
Year 2$2.6M+$1.9M$4.5M12.5%
Year 3$2.7M+$1.9M$4.6M12.7%
Year 4$2.8M+$1.9M$4.6M12.9%
Year 5$2.8M+$1.9M$4.7M13.2%
$24.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$51.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$27.4M
Value Created
$4.7M
Exit EBITDA
$3.9M
Organic Growth
$18.8M
RCM Value Creation
$4.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$358K$537K$716K$859K
Denial Rate Reductio$354K$531K$709K$850K
A/R Days Reduction$218K$327K$436K$523K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$17K$23K$27K
Total$941K$1.4M$1.9M$2.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 84 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.8%-14.1%-8.4%-3.3%
P98
Net-to-Gross21.1%46.6%52.3%58.8%
P2
Occupancy12.7%15.3%21.7%35.1%
P18
Rev/Bed$1.0M$948K$1.3M$1.9M
P33
Exp/Bed$953K$975K$1.4M$2.1M
P23

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML