Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SYCAMORE SPRINGS 2026-04-26 08:50 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SYCAMORE SPRINGS
CCN 154059 | IN | 48 beds | Current EBITDA $4.9M → Pro Forma $6.0M (+$1.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$20.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$772K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$1.1M
Modeled Uplift
$782K
Risk-Adjusted
-$277K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$403K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$399K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$245K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$13K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$403K$403K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$387K$11K$399K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$62K$183K$245K$772K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$13K$13K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT39.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$101K$201K$302K$403K$403K$403K$403K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$100K$199K$299K$399K$399K$399K$399K
A/R Days Reduction$0$82K$163K$245K$245K$245K$245K$245K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K
Cumulative$0$288K$577K$859K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.1x
9.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x
10.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.5x
11.0x32% / 4.1x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x
12.0x28% / 3.5x33% / 4.2x38% / 4.9x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.5x
Headroom (turns)
-7%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -7% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.0x, adding 1.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.9M$4.9M24.6%
Year 1$5.1M+$706K$5.8M28.8%
Year 2$5.2M+$1.1M$6.3M31.3%
Year 3$5.4M+$1.1M$6.5M32.1%
Year 4$5.6M+$1.1M$6.6M32.9%
Year 5$5.7M+$1.1M$6.8M33.8%
$49.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$74.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$25.3M
Value Created
$6.8M
Exit EBITDA
$7.9M
Organic Growth
$10.6M
RCM Value Creation
$6.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$201K$302K$403K$483K
Denial Rate Reductio$199K$299K$399K$478K
A/R Days Reduction$122K$184K$245K$294K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$10K$13K$15K
Total$529K$794K$1.1M$1.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 91 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin24.6%-11.7%-1.6%9.6%
P89
Net-to-Gross36.7%27.6%32.3%39.0%
P69
Occupancy88.6%26.5%42.3%60.6%
P98
Rev/Bed$419K$421K$1.2M$2.0M
P24
Exp/Bed$316K$426K$1.3M$1.9M
P14

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML