Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — OPTIONS BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYSTEM 2026-04-26 12:45 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — OPTIONS BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYSTEM
CCN 154057 | IN | 84 beds | Current EBITDA $6.3M → Pro Forma $7.8M (+$1.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$28.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$6.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$1.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$433K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$576K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$570K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$351K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$18K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$576K$576K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$555K$16K$570K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$88K$262K$351K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$18K$18K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT36.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$144K$288K$432K$576K$576K$576K$576K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$143K$285K$428K$570K$570K$570K$570K
A/R Days Reduction$0$117K$234K$351K$351K$351K$351K$351K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K
Cumulative$0$413K$825K$1.2M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x
9.0x42% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x
10.0x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x
11.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x
12.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x41% / 5.5x42% / 5.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.3x
Headroom (turns)
-5%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -5% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.8x, adding 1.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$6.3M$6.3M21.8%
Year 1$6.5M+$1.0M$7.5M26.0%
Year 2$6.7M+$1.5M$8.2M28.4%
Year 3$6.9M+$1.5M$8.4M29.1%
Year 4$7.1M+$1.5M$8.6M29.8%
Year 5$7.3M+$1.5M$8.8M30.5%
$62.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$96.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$33.9M
Value Created
$8.8M
Exit EBITDA
$10.0M
Organic Growth
$15.2M
RCM Value Creation
$8.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$288K$432K$576K$691K
Denial Rate Reductio$285K$428K$570K$684K
A/R Days Reduction$175K$263K$351K$421K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$14K$18K$22K
Total$758K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 66 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin21.8%-11.7%1.3%15.3%
P80
Net-to-Gross51.5%24.6%30.2%36.7%
P80
Occupancy80.9%42.1%52.9%66.9%
P86
Rev/Bed$343K$364K$1.3M$2.0M
P22
Exp/Bed$268K$331K$1.3M$1.8M
P15

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML