Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HARSHA BEHAVIORAL CENTER 2026-04-26 17:25 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HARSHA BEHAVIORAL CENTER
CCN 154054 | IN | 81 beds | Current EBITDA $1.3M → Pro Forma $2.0M (+$753K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$14.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$753K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+527bps
Margin Improvement
$548K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$753K
Modeled Uplift
$483K
Risk-Adjusted
-$270K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$286K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$283K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$174K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$753K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$286K$286K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$275K$8K$283K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$44K$130K$174K$548K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT36.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$71K$143K$214K$286K$286K$286K$286K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$71K$142K$213K$283K$283K$283K$283K
A/R Days Reduction$0$58K$116K$174K$174K$174K$174K$174K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$205K$410K$611K$753K$753K$753K$753K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $753K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.9x65% / 12.3x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.8x
9.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.3x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.9x
10.0x47% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.3x
11.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x
12.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.2x
Headroom (turns)
18%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 18% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.3x, adding 3.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.3M$1.3M9.0%
Year 1$1.3M+$502K$1.8M12.8%
Year 2$1.4M+$753K$2.1M14.8%
Year 3$1.4M+$753K$2.2M15.1%
Year 4$1.5M+$753K$2.2M15.4%
Year 5$1.5M+$753K$2.2M15.7%
$12.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$24.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$11.8M
Value Created
$2.2M
Exit EBITDA
$2.1M
Organic Growth
$7.5M
RCM Value Creation
$2.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$143K$214K$286K$343K
Denial Rate Reductio$142K$213K$283K$340K
A/R Days Reduction$87K$130K$174K$209K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$376K$565K$753K$904K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 66 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin9.0%-11.6%1.4%18.2%
P62
Net-to-Gross68.2%24.6%30.3%36.7%
P95
Occupancy49.6%42.1%52.9%66.9%
P44
Rev/Bed$177K$404K$1.3M$2.0M
P2
Exp/Bed$161K$355K$1.3M$1.8M
P2

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML