Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BHC MEADOWS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 17:21 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BHC MEADOWS HOSPITAL
CCN 154041 | IN | 78 beds | Current EBITDA $3.6M → Pro Forma $4.4M (+$823K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$15.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$823K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$600K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$823K
Modeled Uplift
$537K
Risk-Adjusted
-$285K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$313K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$310K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$190K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$823K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$313K$313K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$301K$9K$310K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$48K$142K$190K$600K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$78K$156K$235K$313K$313K$313K$313K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$77K$155K$232K$310K$310K$310K$310K
A/R Days Reduction$0$63K$127K$190K$190K$190K$190K$190K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$224K$448K$667K$823K$823K$823K$823K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $823K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x
9.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x54% / 8.8x
10.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x
11.0x33% / 4.1x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x
12.0x29% / 3.5x34% / 4.3x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.4x
Headroom (turns)
-6%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -6% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.9x, adding 1.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.6M$3.6M23.0%
Year 1$3.7M+$548K$4.2M27.2%
Year 2$3.8M+$823K$4.6M29.6%
Year 3$3.9M+$823K$4.7M30.4%
Year 4$4.0M+$823K$4.9M31.1%
Year 5$4.2M+$823K$5.0M31.9%
$35.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$54.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$18.9M
Value Created
$5.0M
Exit EBITDA
$5.7M
Organic Growth
$8.2M
RCM Value Creation
$5.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$156K$235K$313K$375K
Denial Rate Reductio$155K$232K$310K$371K
A/R Days Reduction$95K$143K$190K$228K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$8K$10K$12K
Total$411K$617K$823K$987K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 72 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin23.0%-11.2%1.4%16.8%
P82
Net-to-Gross48.3%24.6%30.3%42.6%
P75
Occupancy52.3%42.3%54.0%66.7%
P44
Rev/Bed$200K$398K$1.1M$1.9M
P3
Exp/Bed$154K$364K$1.2M$1.8M
P0

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML